Torture as part and parcel of authoritarian regimes essay
Authoritarian regimes which still exist in our civilised world continue to use torture as a tool for supporting power. The current phase of the process of change in the politics of the continent is one which is by definition contradictory and far from being unilinear or unidirectional.
They did not. As the use of torture is terminated, the world will have a chance to come together and end terrorism because the main root of terrorism is being inhumane and we should not fall in that category by using torture as our way to fight against it.
Authoritarian regimes definition
Hence, it is unlikely that authoritarian governments will respond to human rights pressures from international community in a positive way. It is a mark of their growing influence that a formal recognition has been conferred on them by the African Union. Toward this end we will discuss the functions and outcomes of torture in authoritarian states, consider the modern cases of torture application and analyse their context, and make the conclusion. At the same time authoritarian regimes tend to manipulate gross human rights violations against individuals and groups to control state of public opinion and to consolidate political power. For example, prisoners of war in Egypt, Greece, and Romewere were often taken into slavery, and they were always subject to torture. That is why, wherever there is change, elements of continuity also abound: change is more often than not unfolded in the womb of one form or another of continuity. This clearly demonstrates that torture is not an effective method because the results can be inaccurate and often misleading. The forces that serve as the bearers of change are the makers of history but they may sometimes be so immersed in the tasks at hand or the demands of the moment as not to be fully aware of the epoch-making nature of their actions or omissions. Words: , Paragraphs: 15, Pages: 6 Publication date: September 21, Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website! While the bulk of the literature notes the expansion which occurred in the course of the s and s in African associational life, the extent to which civil society represents a new, important arena or vector of politics is very much in contention. The arguments that have been marshalled in this regard are varied but they frequently include the expectation that economic structural adjustment will produce or is producing a new bourgeoisie that is rooted in production and disciplined in the ways of the market as to be in a position to mid-wife a genuine democratic transition in Africa.
When facing torture, prisoners will say almost anything to make the pain go away. It is for this reason that the politics of transition has been characterised by an admixture of resistance, adaptation, alliance-building and transformation.
Thus, it is unlikely that even substantial international pressure could eliminate torture and other repressive measures used in authoritarian states. Torture should never be a way to gain advantage over an individual, whether it is mental or physical. Afro-optimists have mostly concentrated their attention on the improved prospects for the continent around the re-structuring of the political terrain; some early commentators were even to assess the changes in terms which spoke of a second liberation or an African renaissance.
It is a mark of their growing influence that a formal recognition has been conferred on them by the African Union.
based on 70 review